BACK TO BLOGS Back to Press Releases

Why AI agents need just-in-time access

Written by:

Written by:

An AI agent may read a document, update a system, and occasionally perform administrative actions. Permanent privilege for the most sensitive step makes every other step unnecessarily powerful.

Prompt injection attacks, compromised integrations, inaccurate instructions, or unexpected behavior can turn legitimate access into an unintended change. Machine-speed activity also leaves less time to intervene.

Just-in-time access provides a more precise model. It helps reduce these risks by limiting an AI agent's access to elevated privileges, rather than allowing those permissions to remain permanently available.

What is just-in-time access for AI agents?

Just-in-time access means temporary permissions are granted when an AI agent needs to perform a specific approved action. Rather than maintaining permanent administrative access, an agent operates with limited permissions and receives temporary elevation only when required for a specific task or resource.

A service-desk agent may read approved articles and create tickets. It should not retain permanent authority to reset privileged accounts, change endpoint configurations, or execute administrative scripts. It can request the exact privilege needed only when required.

The request should identify the agent, initiating user, action, resource, tool, and duration. Policy can approve routine requests automatically or route higher-impact actions for human review. The resulting elevation should work only within that scope.

This is least privilege applied over time. It also supports least agency by limiting consequential actions without additional authorization.

Standing privilege magnifies agent risk

Standing privileges increase the potential impact of an AI agent acting on malicious instructions, making mistakes, or using the wrong tools. An agent with persistent, elevated access may open a browser, retrieve data, invoke PowerShell, call an API, and modify files within seconds, even when those actions fall outside its intended task.

Authentication does not guarantee that each action is safe. An authenticated agent with excessive privileges can misuse legitimate permissions or execute unintended actions. OWASP identifies unnecessary functionality, permissions, and autonomy as key contributors to excessive agency.

Long-lived API keys, administrative tokens, and broadly privileged service accounts extend these risks beyond individual tasks. If an agent, endpoint, integration, or secret store is compromised, attackers may be able to exploit those permissions for as long as they remain valid.

Shared service identities can also weaken accountability by making it difficult to determine who initiated an action, why it occurred, and whether it remained within the agent's authorized scope.

How just-in-time access should work

Effective just-in-time access connects authorization to the action the agent is about to perform.

  • Give every agent a distinct identity and documented purpose. Maintain a low-privilege baseline for routine work without enabling sensitive changes.
  • When elevation is needed, confirm the user, agent, device or workload, tool, resource, action, and risk. A prior approval should not authorize a materially different request.
  • Grant the smallest, useful permission. Elevate one approved application rather than the user or agent. Scope tokens to one service and operation, and data access to the required records.
  • Make the authorization short-lived and revocable. NIST’s recent design tenets for agent identity management recommend just-in-time, time-bounded, and audience-specific access, with individual tool calls and resource requests continuously evaluated against current context and risk.  
  • Record the decision chain: user, agent, request, policy result, approval, credential, tool, changed resource, and outcome. Logs should show when privilege begins and ends.

Not every request needs human approval

Just-in-time does not mean approving every document read, search, or routine ticket. That would slow work and encourage mechanical approval.

Instead, set risk-based thresholds. Low-impact, reversible actions can receive automatic authorization when identity, device, resource, and task conditions match policy.  

Human approval should be reserved for actions with meaningful consequences, including:

  • Executing code or administrative tools
  • Changing security or system configurations
  • Accessing secrets or highly sensitive data
  • Creating accounts, credentials, or permissions
  • Sending externally visible communications
  • Deleting data or performing difficult-to-reverse actions
  • Making purchases or other financial commitments

The reviewer should see the action, target, data, destination, privilege, and expected result. Approval must bind to those parameters so the agent cannot alter or repeat the request indefinitely.

NIST also cautions that excessive human escalation can produce consent fatigue. The objective is not to insert a person everywhere but to automate permitted work while making consequential authority explicit, temporary, and reviewable.  

How to build just-in-time privilege around the workflow

To enforce just-in-time access without causing unnecessary work, the policies should be intentional and reflective of the work that needs to be completed.

  • Observe representative workflows: Identify the applications, files, destinations, credentials, and elevation events required, then separate routine capabilities from exceptional ones.
  • Define policies before deployment and verify that expired access cannot be reused: Test prompt injection, tool substitution, repeated requests, changed parameters, and unauthorized child processes.
  • Review privilege telemetry for frequent elevation, repeated denials, unused permissions, unusual hours, and expanded tasks: These signals may indicate policy drift, process changes, or suspicious behavior.

How to support just-in-time access for AI agents with ThreatLocker  

ThreatLocker Privileged Access Management (PAM) removes standing local administrator rights and allows approved applications to receive elevation under defined conditions and time limits. The application can run with the privilege it requires without elevating the agent or user broadly.  

Zero Trust AI Control (ZTAIC) keeps defined boundaries in place as an agent invokes PowerShell, Office, browsers, scripts, and other approved processes. Policy priority allows stronger restrictions and hard stops to remain effective even when part of the workflow has permission to proceed.  

Application Allowlisting controls which executables and scripts may run, while Ringfencing™ restricts how approved applications interact with files, other processes, the registry, and network destinations. Together, these controls help ensure temporary privilege applies to the approved action instead of becoming a route to unrelated capabilities.  

AI agents can remain useful without retaining administrator-level authority. Give them routine access for routine work, elevate only the specific action that requires it, and remove that authority as soon as the task is complete.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between least privilege and just-in-time access?

Least privilege limits access to what an identity needs. Just-in-time access adds a time dimension by granting elevated access only when a specific task requires it and removing that access afterward.

Should every AI agent action require approval?

No. Low-risk actions that match established policy can proceed automatically. Human approval should focus on sensitive, privileged, externally visible, financially binding, or difficult-to-reverse actions.

How long should an AI agent retain elevated privileges?

Only as long as the approved task requires. Prefer a single action or short session over a broad time window, and revoke access immediately if the context, parameters, or agent behavior changes.

Are short-lived credentials enough to secure an AI agent?

No. They reduce the duration of credential abuse but do not limit every action by themselves. Combine them with narrow authorization, execution and network controls, human approval thresholds, monitoring, and rapid revocation.

No items found.

Start your path to stronger defenses

Start your trial

Try ThreatLocker free for 30 days and experience full Zero Trust protection in your own environment.

Book a demo

Schedule a customized demo and explore how ThreatLocker aligns with your security goals.

Ask an expert

Just starting to explore our platform? Find out what ThreatLocker is, how it works, and how it’s different.